Economic Democracy
Practically all the nations of the world right this moment have come underneath some kind of democratic structure. Liberal democracy has been established in such nations as the USA, Nice Britain, France and Canada, while within the Soviet Union, China, Vietnam, and Japanese Europe socialist democracy is the dominant system. The plight of the individuals in liberal democratic (so called democratic) nations just isn't as miserable as it's in communist countries, because in communist international locations the political and financial system is imposed on society by party officials, causing untold human suffering and extreme psycho-financial exploitation. Each liberal democracy and socialist democracy may be considered types of political democracy because these systems are primarily based on financial and political centralization.
Political Democracy
In all nations where democracy is in vogue in the present day, individuals have been deceived into believing that there isn't a better system than political democracy. Political democracy has little doubt granted voting rights, nevertheless it has snatched away the suitable of economic equality. Consequently, there may be gross financial disparity between the rich and the poor, immense inequality in individuals's buying capability, unemployment, chronic food shortages, poverty and insecurity in society.
The type of democracy prevalent in India can be political democracy, and it has proved to be a unique system of exploitation. The Indian constitution was created by three groups of exploiters: the British exploiters, the Indian imperialists and the ruling events representing the Indian capitalists. All of the provisions of the Indian constitution were framed keeping an eye on furthering the interests of these opportunists. Just to hood wink the masses, the people have been granted the best of common suffrage. Millions of Indians are poor, superstitious and illiterate, yet the exploiters, by means of such practices as making false promises, intimidation, gross abuse of administrative power and vote rigging, repeatedly win over the electorate. This is the farce of democracy. As soon as they form the federal government, they get ample alternative to take pleasure in rampant corruption and political tyranny for 5 years. Within the subsequent elections - whether on the provincial or state stage - the identical absurdity is repeated.
This type of political opportunism has been occurring in India since Independence. For the last thirty-5 years, the political events have maintained that as a way to attain financial parity with the industrially developed countries of Europe, India must follow the democratic system. To support this argument, they cite the examples of America and Great Britain or China and the Soviet Union. The political leaders urge the electorate to vote of their favor at election time so that the country's ravenous plenty can reap the benefits of a developed economy. But as soon as the elections are over, the exploitation of the common people continues unabated in the garb of political democracy, and different areas of social life are completely neglected. At this time hundreds of thousands of Indian citizens are being deprived of the minimal requirements of life and are struggling to procure adequate food, clothing, housing, education and medical remedy, while a handful of persons are rolling in monumental wealth and luxury.
One of the apparent defects of democracy is that voting relies upon common suffrage. That's, the correct to cast a vote relies on age. As soon as folks attain a certain age, it is assumed that they've the requisite capability to weigh the pros and cons of the issues in an election and choose the most effective candidate. However there are numerous individuals above the voting age who've little or no interest in elections and aren't conversant with social or financial issues. In lots of cases they vote for the party slightly than the candidate, and are swayed by election propaganda or the false promises of politicians. Those that have not reached the voting age are often more capable of selecting the right candidate than those who are entitled to vote. So age shouldn't be the yardstick for voting rights.
Whether or not a candidate gets elected often relies upon upon party affiliation, political patronage and election expenditure. In some cases it additionally relies on antisocial practices. All through the world, money plays a dominant position in the electoral process, and in practically all cases, only those who are rich and powerful can hope to secure elected office. In these cases the place voting isn't compulsory, usually only a small percentage of the population participates in the electoral process.
The prerequisites for the success of democracy are morality, training and socio-economico-political consciousness. Leaders especially should be people of high ethical character, otherwise the welfare of society shall be jeopardized. However right now in most democracies, folks of doubtful character and people with vested interests are elected to power. Even bandits and murderers stand for election and kind the government.
In nearly all the countries of the world, the plenty lack political consciousness. Cunning, erudite politicians take advantage of this shortcoming to confuse folks and attain power. They resort to immoral practices corresponding to bribery, vote rigging, booth capturing and shopping for of votes, and stand unopposed for elections. Consequently, the standard of morality in society is declining, and sincere, competent persons are relegated to the background. Ethical leaders have less probability to win elections because election results are rigged by means of financial inducements, intimidation and brute force. In the current democratic system, all types of immoral and corrupt practices are given the chance to pervert society. The very nature of the present system is that it favors the capitalists and exposes the administration to immoral and corrupt forces.
The farce of democracy has been likened to a puppet show the place a handful of power hungry politicians pull the strings from behind the scene. In liberal democracies, capitalists manipulate the mass media corresponding to radio, television and newspapers, while in socialist democracies the bureaucrats lead the country to the brink of destruction. In both forms of democracy, there is little scope for honest, competent leaders to emerge in society, and virtually no chance for the economic liberation of the people.
Political democracy has turn out to be an awesome hoax for the individuals of the world. It promises the advent of an era of peace, prosperity and equality, however in reality it creates criminals, encourages exploitation and throws frequent people into an abyss of sorrow and suffering.
Political Democracy
In all nations where democracy is in vogue in the present day, individuals have been deceived into believing that there isn't a better system than political democracy. Political democracy has little doubt granted voting rights, nevertheless it has snatched away the suitable of economic equality. Consequently, there may be gross financial disparity between the rich and the poor, immense inequality in individuals's buying capability, unemployment, chronic food shortages, poverty and insecurity in society.
The type of democracy prevalent in India can be political democracy, and it has proved to be a unique system of exploitation. The Indian constitution was created by three groups of exploiters: the British exploiters, the Indian imperialists and the ruling events representing the Indian capitalists. All of the provisions of the Indian constitution were framed keeping an eye on furthering the interests of these opportunists. Just to hood wink the masses, the people have been granted the best of common suffrage. Millions of Indians are poor, superstitious and illiterate, yet the exploiters, by means of such practices as making false promises, intimidation, gross abuse of administrative power and vote rigging, repeatedly win over the electorate. This is the farce of democracy. As soon as they form the federal government, they get ample alternative to take pleasure in rampant corruption and political tyranny for 5 years. Within the subsequent elections - whether on the provincial or state stage - the identical absurdity is repeated.
This type of political opportunism has been occurring in India since Independence. For the last thirty-5 years, the political events have maintained that as a way to attain financial parity with the industrially developed countries of Europe, India must follow the democratic system. To support this argument, they cite the examples of America and Great Britain or China and the Soviet Union. The political leaders urge the electorate to vote of their favor at election time so that the country's ravenous plenty can reap the benefits of a developed economy. But as soon as the elections are over, the exploitation of the common people continues unabated in the garb of political democracy, and different areas of social life are completely neglected. At this time hundreds of thousands of Indian citizens are being deprived of the minimal requirements of life and are struggling to procure adequate food, clothing, housing, education and medical remedy, while a handful of persons are rolling in monumental wealth and luxury.
One of the apparent defects of democracy is that voting relies upon common suffrage. That's, the correct to cast a vote relies on age. As soon as folks attain a certain age, it is assumed that they've the requisite capability to weigh the pros and cons of the issues in an election and choose the most effective candidate. However there are numerous individuals above the voting age who've little or no interest in elections and aren't conversant with social or financial issues. In lots of cases they vote for the party slightly than the candidate, and are swayed by election propaganda or the false promises of politicians. Those that have not reached the voting age are often more capable of selecting the right candidate than those who are entitled to vote. So age shouldn't be the yardstick for voting rights.
Whether or not a candidate gets elected often relies upon upon party affiliation, political patronage and election expenditure. In some cases it additionally relies on antisocial practices. All through the world, money plays a dominant position in the electoral process, and in practically all cases, only those who are rich and powerful can hope to secure elected office. In these cases the place voting isn't compulsory, usually only a small percentage of the population participates in the electoral process.
The prerequisites for the success of democracy are morality, training and socio-economico-political consciousness. Leaders especially should be people of high ethical character, otherwise the welfare of society shall be jeopardized. However right now in most democracies, folks of doubtful character and people with vested interests are elected to power. Even bandits and murderers stand for election and kind the government.
In nearly all the countries of the world, the plenty lack political consciousness. Cunning, erudite politicians take advantage of this shortcoming to confuse folks and attain power. They resort to immoral practices corresponding to bribery, vote rigging, booth capturing and shopping for of votes, and stand unopposed for elections. Consequently, the standard of morality in society is declining, and sincere, competent persons are relegated to the background. Ethical leaders have less probability to win elections because election results are rigged by means of financial inducements, intimidation and brute force. In the current democratic system, all types of immoral and corrupt practices are given the chance to pervert society. The very nature of the present system is that it favors the capitalists and exposes the administration to immoral and corrupt forces.
The farce of democracy has been likened to a puppet show the place a handful of power hungry politicians pull the strings from behind the scene. In liberal democracies, capitalists manipulate the mass media corresponding to radio, television and newspapers, while in socialist democracies the bureaucrats lead the country to the brink of destruction. In both forms of democracy, there is little scope for honest, competent leaders to emerge in society, and virtually no chance for the economic liberation of the people.
Political democracy has turn out to be an awesome hoax for the individuals of the world. It promises the advent of an era of peace, prosperity and equality, however in reality it creates criminals, encourages exploitation and throws frequent people into an abyss of sorrow and suffering.
